[ djordje @ 08.05.2005. 00:36 ] @
panline.net 100k [Ovu poruku je menjao djordje dana 08.05.2005. u 11:18 GMT+1] |
[ djordje @ 08.05.2005. 00:36 ] @
[ twix @ 08.05.2005. 00:56 ] @
[ djordje @ 08.05.2005. 01:30 ] @
Ne razumem. Cilj teme je bio da se vidi kakav ljudi imaju ping ka google
[ Slobodan Miskovic @ 08.05.2005. 01:42 ] @
evo
[ Mikky @ 08.05.2005. 02:17 ] @
Google nije bio dostupan par minuta. Prica se da je hakovan
http://www.gigaom.com/2005/05/07/google-hacked/ [ anon7994 @ 08.05.2005. 10:34 ] @
Google shuts down for 15 minutes
Associated Press MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. - Googling stopped for 15 minutes on Saturday. The world's leading internet search engine shut down from 6:45 to 7 p.m. eastern time, according to Google spokesman David Krane. "It was not a hacking or a security issue," said Krane. He said the problem was related to the DNS, or Domain Name System, though Krane did not elaborate. The DNS translates domain names for computers. "Google's global properties were unavailable for a short period of time," Krane said. "We've remedied the problem and access to Google has been restored worldwide." On Wednesday, the company, based in Mountain View, launched its Web Accelerator service. It's intended to speed access to Web pages by offering cached or compressed copies of sites from Google's servers. There are an estimated 200 million Google searches a day. [ VRKY @ 08.05.2005. 11:21 ] @
[ dejan @ 08.05.2005. 14:57 ] @
Meni malopre izadje ovo (pogledaj attachment) kad sam pokusao da trazim nesto... Jel se desilo slicno jos nekom, posto zaista sumnjam da sam inficiran nekim virusom?!
[ Burgos @ 08.05.2005. 15:42 ] @
linux:~/Desktop/paralel $ ping www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (66.249.85.104) 56(84) bytes of data. --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 70 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 68997ms Sezam [ H@usto® @ 08.05.2005. 20:28 ] @
Sigurnosni strucnjaci upozoravaju na novu opasnost koja prieti onima koji slucajno pogrešno ukucaju Googleovu adresu.
Nenamerni posetilac stranica koje se nalaze na adresi www.googkle.com bice bombardovan svim vrstama zlocudnih programa, poput trojanskih konja, spyware-ova i pokušaja iskorišcavanja raznih sigurnosnih propusta. Obzirom da na vecini tastatura slova k i l stoje jedno do drugog, ocekuje se da bi broj onih koji slucajno pritisnu oba tastera prilikom upisivanje Google-ove adrese mogao biti relativno veliki. Stoga sigurnosni strucnjaci posebno upozoravaju na ovu stranicu, iako na Internetu postoji mnoštvo jednako ili cak više zlocudnih stranica. Za sada nema komentara iz Google-a na ove informacije, no u prošlosti su obicno veliki portali na Internetu štitili svoje korisnike od ovakvih propusta jednostavno preusmjeravajuci korisnike na prave stranice. ________ O tome vam pricam... A evo i mog pingovanja.... [ pajaja @ 08.05.2005. 21:12 ] @
[att_img]
meni googkle.com ne radi :) [ markolazarevic @ 08.05.2005. 22:09 ] @
djordje se ispravio prvo je napisao google.net :)
[ djordje @ 08.05.2005. 22:14 ] @
aha, ali nema veze, isti djavo
[ FormatC @ 08.05.2005. 23:54 ] @
Code: $ ping -c6 www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (66.249.85.104) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=570 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=295 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=245 time=519 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=4 ttl=245 time=1831 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=5 ttl=245 time=2977 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=6 ttl=245 time=295 ms --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 8470ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 295.805/1081.874/2977.502/997.396 ms, pipe 2 Upomoć, nestao googkle ;) [ Picsel @ 09.05.2005. 09:59 ] @
Wireless 100k
Code: $ ping -c5 www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (216.239.59.147): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 216.239.59.147: icmp_seq=0 ttl=238 time=66.7 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.59.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=96.8 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.59.147: icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=63.5 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.59.147: icmp_seq=3 ttl=238 time=93.3 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.59.147: icmp_seq=4 ttl=238 time=125.3 ms --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 63.5/89.1/125.3 ms Code: $ ping -c5 www.elitesecurity.org PING www.elitesecurity.org (217.26.67.165): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 217.26.67.165: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=68.2 ms 64 bytes from 217.26.67.165: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=56.0 ms 64 bytes from 217.26.67.165: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=103.6 ms 64 bytes from 217.26.67.165: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.8 ms 64 bytes from 217.26.67.165: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=65.8 ms --- www.elitesecurity.org ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 52.8/69.2/103.6 ms [ Nikola Denić @ 09.05.2005. 10:17 ] @
Pinging google.com [216.239.57.99]: Ping #1: Got reply from 216.239.57.99 in 107ms [TTL=238] Ping #2: Got reply from 216.239.57.99 in 88ms [TTL=238] Ping #3: Got reply from 216.239.57.99 in 88ms [TTL=238] Ping #4: Got reply from 216.239.57.99 in 87ms [TTL=238] Done pinging google.com! [ S_Kid @ 09.05.2005. 14:57 ] @
Ovo je Sezam ADSL@256
C:\>ping www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [66.249.85.99] with 32 bytes Reply from 66.249.85.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=248 Reply from 66.249.85.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=248 Reply from 66.249.85.99: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=248 Reply from 66.249.85.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=248 Ping statistics for 66.249.85.99: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 60ms, Average = 57ms C:\>ping www.elitesecurity.org Pinging www.elitesecurity.org [217.26.67.165] with 32 Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=53 Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=53 Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=53 Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 217.26.67.165: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 179ms, Maximum = 198ms, Average = 187ms [ @lien @ 09.05.2005. 19:01 ] @
Modem, 042 210 110
-------------------------------------------------------------- C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1.UFO>ping www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=239 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=189ms TTL=239 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=185ms TTL=239 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=239 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 177ms, Maximum = 201ms, Average = 188ms --------------------------------------------------------------- eS C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1.UFO>ping www.elitesecurity.org Pinging www.elitesecurity.org [217.26.67.165] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=51 Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=208ms TTL=51 Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=185ms TTL=51 Reply from 217.26.67.165: bytes=32 time=184ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 217.26.67.165: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 184ms, Maximum = 208ms, Average = 195ms [ zaraza @ 09.05.2005. 19:24 ] @
aj kad ste navalili
[space@zwer /home\ $]ping -c5 www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (66.249.85.104) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=30.1 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=29.4 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=247 time=30.5 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=4 ttl=247 time=31.5 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.85.104: icmp_seq=5 ttl=247 time=32.5 ms --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.450/30.842/32.515/1.091 ms ========================================================= [space@zwer /home\ $]ping -c5 www.elitesecurity.org PING www.elitesecurity.org (217.26.67.165) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from l33t.mafia.elitesecurity.org (217.26.67.165): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=31.3 ms 64 bytes from l33t.mafia.elitesecurity.org (217.26.67.165): icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=10.0 ms 64 bytes from l33t.mafia.elitesecurity.org (217.26.67.165): icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=8.95 ms 64 bytes from l33t.mafia.elitesecurity.org (217.26.67.165): icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=7.96 ms 64 bytes from l33t.mafia.elitesecurity.org (217.26.67.165): icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=10.9 ms --- www.elitesecurity.org ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.962/13.862/31.369/8.812 ms kako vidim najbolji sam :) [ smfilip @ 09.05.2005. 19:31 ] @
Pinging www.l.google.com [66.249.85.104] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=1787ms TTL=240 Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=1156ms TTL=240 Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=1468ms TTL=240 Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=1672ms TTL=240 Ping statistics for 66.249.85.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1156ms, Maximum = 1787ms, Average = 1520ms CUVENI Internet CG [ twix @ 09.05.2005. 20:09 ] @
56k modem
Pinging www.l.google.com [66.249.85.104] with 32 bytes of data Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=243 Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=243 Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=243 Reply from 66.249.85.104: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 66.249.85.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 190ms, Average = 178ms [ grunger_ @ 12.05.2005. 17:01 ] @
Radijus-vektor 64 kb
Pinging www.l.google.com [216.239.59.147] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.239.59.147: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=234 Reply from 216.239.59.147: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=234 Reply from 216.239.59.147: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=234 Reply from 216.239.59.147: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=234 Ping statistics for 216.239.59.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 73ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 76ms Copyright (C) 2001-2024 by www.elitesecurity.org. All rights reserved.
|