Hakeri prevarili policiju – uhapšena pogrešna osoba?

[ Milan Kragujevic @ 30.07.2011. 13:08 ] @

Nakon što je objavljeno da je uhapšen jedan od vođa i glasnogovornik hakerske grupe LulzSec, internetom kruže glasine da je haker prevario policiju koja je uhapsila pogrešnu osobu.

Pre dva dana objavljeno je da je u Velikoj Britaniji uhapšen jedan od najpoznatijih, odnosno medijski najeksponiranijih hakera i glasnogovornik LulzSeca – Topiary.

Odmah nakon hapšenja policija se pohvalila velikim ulovom, a na internetskim stranicama i Twitteru mogli smo pročitati brojne analize o sledećim koracima policije, ali i hakera. Tako je jedan od najistaknutijih članova LulzSeca – Sabu na svom Twitter profilu napisao RIP Topiary i odao slavu ‘palim Anonymousima’, nakon čega su mnogi zaključili da je ‘pravi’ Topiary zaista uhapšen.
No, ubrzo su se na hakerskim forumima i Twitteru počele pojavljivati informacije da je Topiary zavarao policiju i naveo ih na krivi trag tako da uhapšeni 19-godišnjak možda niti nema veze s LulzSecom.
[...]

[ konislav @ 30.07.2011. 23:55 ] @

Ja obozavam price o hakerima, ne zato sto verujem u sposobnosti raznoraznih klinaca i ovih starijih koji imaju pamet deteta, vec zato sto su toliko glupe, a traju 30 godina sa tenencijom da nikad ne nestanu.
Kad sam ja bio negde pri kraju osnovne skole pojavio se na ovim prostorima ZX SPECTRUM, cudo nebesko, doduse tad jos nismo nase drugare zvali hakerima, ali je to bilo nesto nevidjeno.
Onda se pojavi i film Ratne igde (War Games) i tu smo prvi put videli nekog naseg vrsnjaka koji je usao u Pentagon. Tad smo poceli da slusamo za nekakve HAKERE, to je negde pocetak osamdesetih. Do dan danas nekakvi hakeri ulaze u nekakve sisteme i oni su losi momci, a onda ih ovi dobri kao nesto love i proganjaju i nikako da ih uhvate. medjutim celo vreme se prica kako su ovi negativci (uvek je to neko super-pametno dete ili omladinac) mnogo sposobni, a uvek se nekako precuti da vecina uspeha ovih sposobnih dolazi od nepostovanja osnovnih principa zestite i bezbednosti sistema. Uvek procitamo kako je neko negde uspeo da udje, a nikako da procitamo kako je odgovarao onaj ko nije zavrsio svoj posao i zastitio sistem.

[ payge @ 31.07.2011. 00:24 ] @

Haker Excel Expert Genije u akciji

[ Nabukodonosor @ 31.07.2011. 00:39 ] @

heheh

[ anon70939 @ 31.07.2011. 08:44 ] @

hahahahaa.

konislav u akciji

[ Ankalagon the Black @ 31.07.2011. 08:44 ] @

Ha ha ha, sad sam procitao temu sa linka. Jbg, ne mogu svi da budu hakeri :)

http://publicintelligence.net/...n-the-u-s-is-an-fbi-informant/

A ni hakeri nisu sto su nekad bili :) (po principu: ko ce koga nego svoj svoga)

Citat:

Defcon crowd have also grown into an entire industry, a specialism of modern policing, with highly trained and computer literate FBI and secret service agents running an army of informants who now pervade the hacker community.

Neki interesantni linkovi:

http://www.softwar.net/mcc.html

Citat:

SOFTWAR: What is the mission of the NSA?

McConnell: Signals Intelligence. SIGINT is NSA's mission. The NSA is either talking to someone (wtf?! :)) or listening to someone talk. The mission is to exploit human intelligence. However, the NSA's mission does NOT include domestic surveillance, which is patently against the law. Domestic surveillance is the FBI's job.

Citat:

SOFTWAR: Documents obtained by Freedom of Information requests show that Vince Foster attended a meeting at the NSA headquarters on May 2, 1993. What role did Mr. Foster have in Clipper or at the NSA?

McConnell: Foster had NO NO NO NO role in Clipper. He never went to NSA headquarters to meet on Clipper. The May 2, 1993 meeting at Ft. Meade is an annual event called "Law Day". It is a dog and pony show for the power elite. I doubt that Foster even knew what crypto meant. John Podesta was our contact inside the White House.

John Podesta, negde sam vec cuo to ime. On znaci zna sta crypto znaci. Cini mi se da se Podesta pojavljivao na nekakvim konferencijama iznoseci nekakve stavove u vezi slobode informisanja ili tako nesto slicno ?

Citat:

SOFTWAR: Does this lack of awareness reflect a general ignorance about encryption technology in the public and at the highest levels?

McConnell: 99% of the American public has no idea what crypto is.

Citat:

SOFTWAR: The recent Presidential report on US Computer Security released by General Marsh made NO mention of encryption as a defensive tool against hackers and terrorists. Why did the General omit such an important issue?

McConnell: When I found out that General Marsh was tasked to write the President's report on information security I went to Admiral Studeman, the previous Director of the NSA. We decided we owed it to Marsh to explain the crypto problem. We spoke to him for about two hours until his eyes glazed over. Marsh declared the encryption issue too difficult a problem for him to tackle in his report. He simply said he was going to answer the President's questions on computer security. No more. No less.

Hmmm...

_{[Ovu poruku je menjao Ankalagon the Black dana 31.07.2011. u 13:36 GMT+1]}