[ boxxter @ 23.03.2010. 17:56 ] @
It’s fair to say that my enforced estrangement from my Facebook community has been a wrench. It feels a bit like when all the kids in the playground suddenly decide you smell of wee. Or being excommunicated from the Catholic Church – except to be excommunicated you have to have done something pretty grave, whereas Facebook apparently boots its users out more or less arbitrarily.


http://technology.timesonline....ech_and_web/article7064227.ece
[ Srđan Pavlović @ 23.03.2010. 18:01 ] @
imaju 300m korisnika, i sad ce oni da vode istragu za svakog... da li je
"pravedno" boot-ovan il ne...
[ boxxter @ 23.03.2010. 20:56 ] @
A smesno mi sto poredi to sa iskljucivanjem iz katolicke crkve...xD. Nije bitan razlog sto je izbacena...:P. New religion?
[ Ivan Dimkovic @ 23.03.2010. 20:57 ] @
Jok i nije - e-sektasi pravi :)

Mukica...
[ boxxter @ 23.03.2010. 21:21 ] @
Try and get your Facebook page reinstated however, and you face a Kafkaesque nightmare of bureaucratic indifference. Every e-mail from the polite ("Terribly sorry, think you may have made a mistake") to the primal howl of despair ("FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, TELL ME WHAT I DID!") was met with a stony silence. The Facebook policy, it seems, is not to tell you what your crime was.

This leads to something akin to the self-criticisms of Mao-era China – I hereby denounce myself for occasional profanity and posting a slightly risqué picture of me with a stripper wearing nipple tassels. Given that comparing the company to a repressive communist regime is unlikely to have helped my case with Facebook, I’m left with a quandary. Do I take a stand, gather up the shreds of my dignity and break the addiction? Or do I scuttle back, tail between legs, and start a new account. And if I do, will I ever dare swear in my status updates again?
[ boxxter @ 23.03.2010. 21:30 ] @
I jos jedan zanimljiv link sa iste strane:

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg says privacy is dead. So why does he want to keeps this picture hidden?

It’s one law for the rich and another for the rest of us as our secrets are paraded online

As Daniel Masoliver, a 24-year-old postgraduate student in London, put it: “The only reason privacy ever existed is because Facebook didn’t. People have always liked talking about what they’re into and the more people share information with one another, the more comfortable others are joining in.”

Nevertheless, some online reaction to Zuckerberg’s claims was hostile. “He’s an idiot,” wrote one social networker; “Poppycock,” said another.

Experts in the social networking phenomenon are also concerned. The erosion of privacy, they say, brings dangers for both individuals and the wider body politic.

Sherry Turkle, professor of social studies of science at Massachussets Institute of Technology, said insensitivity to privacy “shows a disregard of history and the importance of privacy to democracy and, I might add, intimacy. Young people are not unconcerned about this matter. But they feel impotent”.

http://technology.timesonline....web/the_web/article6991010.ece
[ Ivan Dimkovic @ 23.03.2010. 21:48 ] @
Citat:

It’s one law for the rich and another for the rest of us as our secrets are paraded online


What a load of crap @#)(&*

Privatnost ne postoji za one koji odluce da od svog zivota naprave Reality Show koriscenjem tih "socijalnih mreza".

Za sve ostale, problema nema. Kako nesto moze biti 'secret' ako je korisnik sam odlucio da to podeli sa kompletnom zemaljskom kuglom... to je kao da izadjes na Times Square, skines se go - i onda krenes da urlas da ti neko "krade privatnost".
[ boxxter @ 23.03.2010. 22:01 ] @
He he. U pravu si. I ovo je dobro:

Anderson is only half-joking when he says social networking has become a “survival necessity” for the young.

“At Cambridge all the party invitations go out on Facebook,” he said. “So if you don’t have Facebook, you won’t get invited to any parties, so you won’t have any sex, so you won’t have any children, so your genes die out. So it’s an evolutionary necessity to be on Facebook.”

Just remember, when you accept that Facebook invitation to a hot date, do not use a Blippy card to buy contraceptives on the way there. Unless you want the whole world to know what you are thinking.

http://technology.timesonline....web/the_web/article6991010.ece
[ boxxter @ 23.03.2010. 23:05 ] @
Citat:
: It’s fair to say that my enforced estrangement from my Facebook community has been a wrench. It feels a bit like when all the kids in the playground suddenly decide you smell of wee. Or being excommunicated from the Catholic Church


http://technology.timesonline....ech_and_web/article7064227.ece



Doci ce dan kada ce oni koji su izbaceni sa fejsa, morati da idu drugom stranom ulice, i da nose traku na rukavu. A ostali ce da pokazuju na njih i da sapucu " they have been booted off Facebook " hh.

[ Nenad Vranjanac @ 23.03.2010. 23:34 ] @
vec predosecam da ce uskoro poceti da se prodaju facebook redemptioni ko sto je bilo u 13.veku

for amount of 1M fb credits you can redeem foul language sins
for...
[ boxxter @ 24.03.2010. 00:24 ] @
Ili ce nase profile na policijskim sajtovima da zameni fejs. Ustvari ti sajtovi dosta lice, samo sto su na policijskim malo detaljniji profili. Ili nisu?

Dobra ideja za scenario za film. Dolazi covek na aerodrom na pasosku kontrolu - " Pls, give me your facebook ID " -" I don`t have facebook "
- " MASTER ALARM !!! "
[ Nenad Vranjanac @ 24.03.2010. 00:45 ] @
razlika je sto ovaj popunjavas sam ;)
[ boxxter @ 24.03.2010. 10:16 ] @
Pa donekle si u pravu..:


By analysing such data, “spider” programs can draw up social graphs that reveal your sexuality, political beliefs and other characteristics. According to Ross Anderson, professor of security engineering at Cambridge, it can be done even if you list as few as eight friends.


Other concerns relate to how social networking sites use your data behind the scenes. Facebook’s privacy policy runs to more than eight pages of A4 and few users will read it. If you do, you will learn that Facebook “may collect information about you from other Facebook users”; keep details of any transactions you make; and allow third parties access to information about you. It also admits it “cannot ensure that information you share on Facebook will not become publicly available”.

EVER since George Orwell wrote Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Big Brother state has been most people’s first concern about diminishing privacy.