[ euripyd @ 16.11.2004. 19:27 ] @
Zracenja mobilnih telefona (istrazivanje iz Svedske)

Proizvodjac – model – SAR vrednost (Specific Absobtion Rate: vati na kilogram)

Alcatel 511 0,30
Alcatel 512 0,30
Alcatel 715 0,35
Alcatel 525 0,60
Alcatel 531 0,86
Benefon Twin Dual 1,01
Ericsson SH688 0,91
Ericsson R310s 0,94
Ericsson R320s 0,94
Ericsson GH688 0,95
Ericsson T28 1,27
Ericsson T28s 1,27
LG 7100 0,32
LG G5300i 0,43
LG 7050 0,64
LG 8110 1,07
LG C1100 1,12
Mitsubishi M341i 0,36
Mitsubishi M342i 0,79
Mitsubishi M320 0,87
Motorola MPX200 0,12
Motorola V80 0,54
Motorola A835 0,55
Motorola A925 0,65
Motorola C550 0,71
Motorola A920 0,75
Motorola C200 0,78
Motorola V600 0,82
Motorola C250 0,83
Motorola C650 0,87
Motorola E365 0,88
Motorola C350 0,90
Motorola V500 0,90
Motorola V525 0,90
Motorola C450 0,92
Motorola V300 0,93
Motorola E398 1,01
NEC 313 0,50
NEC 616 0,64
NEC 606 0,76
NEC DB4000 1,23
Nokia 8890 0,26
Nokia 9210 0,34
Nokia 7650 0,35
Nokia THR850 0,35
Nokia 7200 0,36
Nokia 8850 0,43
Nokia 5100 0,48
Nokia 8910 0,52
Nokia THR880 0,52
Nokia 7610 0,54
Nokia 2100 0,55
Nokia 6250 0,55
Nokia 3200 0,56
Nokia NGAUGE 0,57
Nokia 6230 0,59
Nokia 6100 0,60
Nokia 7250 0,60
Nokia 6800 0,61
Nokia 5210 0,62
Nokia 6610 0,63
Nokia 7210 0,63
Nokia 6650 0,64
Nokia 3510 0,66
Nokia 6220 0,66
Nokia 1100 0,67
Nokia 5110 0,69
Nokia 6150 0,69
Nokia 7600 0,71
Nokia 3650 0,72
Nokia 6820 0,72
Nokia 8110 0,73
Nokia 5510 0,74
Nokia 3300 0,77
Nokia 6600 0,80
Nokia 3210 0,81
Nokia 3410 0,81
Nokia 6310 0,81
Nokia 6510 0,81
Nokia 6210 0,82
Nokia 6810 0,82
Nokia 8310 0,82
Nokia 3510i 0,83
Nokia 2300 0,86
Nokia 6110 0,87
Nokia 7110 0,90
Nokia 3310 0,96
Nokia 3330 0,96
Nokia 8210 1,00
Nokia 8810 1,14
Panasonic X70 0,46
Panasonic X400 0,56
Panasonic X300 0,86
Philips Azalis 0,50
Philips 355 0,66
Sagem MYX5 0,64
Sagem MYX6 0,65
Samsung SGH E800 0,32
Samsung SGH C100 0,46
Samsung SGH P510 0,52
Samsung SGH X400 0,60
Samsung SGH V200 0,69
Samsung SGH Z105 0,70
Samsung SGH X100 0,76
Samsung SGH E700 0,80
Samsung SGH X600 0,84
Samsung SGH E100 0,89
Samsung SGH A800 0,96
Samsung SGH X450 0,98
Samsung SGH S100 1,01
Samsung SGH S300 1,14
Samsung SGH P400 1,18
Siemens ST60 0,47
Siemens S65 0,48
Siemens C55 0,49
Siemens SX1 0,52
Siemens S55 0,53
Siemens A55 0,56
Siemens CX65 0,59
Siemens SL55 0,62
Siemens M55 0,64
Siemens A60 0,67
Siemens C60 0,67
Siemens C62 0,72
Siemens C65 0,73
Siemens ST55 0,74
Siemens CF62 0,75
Siemens CL50 0,88
Siemens M65 0,88
Siemens S45 0,95
Siemens A50 0,97
Siemens A52 0,97
Siemens ME45 0,98
Siemens M50 1,01
Siemens A36 1,11
Sony/Ericsson TZ600 0,16
Sony/Ericsson T68i 0,38
Sony/Ericsson SH888 0,42
Sony/Ericsson K700 0,48
Sony/Ericsson T68 0,49
Sony/Ericsson K500i 0,53
Sony/Ericsson T18s 0,61
Sony/Ericsson T200 0,63
Sony/Ericsson P800 0,64
Sony/Ericsson T230 0,74
Sony/Ericsson T300 0,80
Sony/Ericsson T602 0,80
Sony/Ericsson T310 0,81
Sony/Ericsson T100 0,84
Sony/Ericsson T66 0,85
Sony/Ericsson T630 0,88
Sony/Ericsson T610 0,89
Sony/Ericsson P900 0,91
Sony/Ericsson Z200 0,94
Sony/Ericsson T65 0,98
Sony/Ericsson Z1010 1,41
Siemens S55 0.53
Siemens S65 0.48
Siemens SL55 0.62
Siemens ST55 0.74
Siemens ST60 0.47
Siemens SX1 0.52
[ kime1 @ 17.11.2004. 00:11 ] @
Kolika beše granica,oko 1.45?!
[ zaraza @ 17.11.2004. 01:56 ] @
granica za sta?
[ flylord @ 10.02.2005. 17:29 ] @
http://www.digit-life.com/articles/mobilesafety/

Citat:
However already there are certificates of an indirect harm of antennas of cellular communication placed in occupied points. According to the data of German scientists who have tested three standards of cellular communication NMT-450, GSM 900 and GSM 1800 (telephones were tested directly) and 231 cardio stimulators of various corporations - manufacturer more than 30 % cardio stimulators are effected by telephones operating in standards NMT-450 and GSM 900. The influence of telephones standard GSM 1800 on cardio stimulators was not revealed. The measurement of radiation near antennas of cellular communication was not carried out but it is possible to tell with confidence that the radiation power of the base station is from 6 up to 10W but for a handset it is from 0,05 up to 0,6 W.


Citat:
Despite of so large tolerances in questions of safety cellular couplers Great Britain was first to begin examining the question on influence mobile telephones on health of children. On 11.05.00 the report of leading British scientists on learning effect of mobile telephones on health of children was published. In the report it is marked that children should not use mobile telephones because of the greater receptivity of children's organism to operation of electric waves. The research was carried out by the order of the British government that at once has reacted to the obtained report. The ministers have received the instruction to develop new rules of usage mobile telephones by children in which the minimum age of the users, maximum duration of talk and quantity of allowed daily bells will be indicated. Information about possible risk for children - users of mobile telephones has confused many companies of mobile communication as they planned this quota in the business - schedules.


[quote]The British researchers proved that miniature earphones (hand's free) for cellular telephones are harmful were distinguished again. Many people use such earphones assuming that they reduce harmful effect of the antenna cellular telephone, but all turns out just on the contrary. As researches of the British association of customers have shown these devices operate as original antenna and the level of electric waves coming into brain of a user three times exceeds the level of a usual telephone in a handset. Though till now the connection between irradiation and morbidity of the users is not installed the association advises customers to limit usage of similar devices.[/qiote]




[Ovu poruku je menjao flylord dana 10.02.2005. u 18:34 GMT+1]
[ flylord @ 10.02.2005. 17:32 ] @
Level of safety of a cellular telephone is estimated in SAR (Specific Absorption Rates) - level of radiation (emission) in watts of radiated energy on kg of brain (W/kg). The less is the value SAR, the more safe is the device.
[ momsab @ 02.06.2005. 10:56 ] @
Citat:
kime1: Kolika beše granica,oko 1.45?!

zvanično 2 W/Kg

preteraše sa gornjom granicom
gornja, najgornja granica je 1W/Kg. sve iznad toga izbegavajte. kad kupujem mobilni telefon, jedna od stavki koje obavezno gledam je SAR. ako naletite na neki telefon koji ima dobar odnos cena/kvallitet, pod obavezno proverite SAR.

lista iz prošle godine
[ IcyImpact @ 10.10.2005. 11:32 ] @
Sva ta galama oko mobitela je nepotrebna. Onaj tko je posteno odigrao DOOM3 nagutao se toliko zracenja koliko i nekoliko godina koristenja mobitela.
[ fanfon @ 10.10.2005. 12:18 ] @
To ne znaci da takvi treba da se dodatno zrace ako ne moraju.Ima ljudi koji ne igraju igrice i ne sede danima za racunarom. U svakom slucaju, ja sam poucen nekim rezultatima istrazivanja o zracenju telefona, prebacio mobilni iz prednjeg u zadnji dzep...
[ IcyImpact @ 10.10.2005. 20:37 ] @
Ma hocu rec da zracenje mobitela nije tako strasno kako se misli i da se oko toga ne bi trebala dizati velika panika.
[ davidbowman @ 10.09.2006. 10:32 ] @
Znam da je topic star skoro godinu dana ali me zanima da li neko zna koliko je zračenje za Sony Ericsson k600i jer ga nema na listama?
[ Fuzz @ 12.09.2006. 11:45 ] @
Oko 0,5-0,6....
Gotov si...
[ momsab @ 19.11.2007. 16:45 ] @
malo da osvezimo temu:
http://www.sarvalues.com/index.html i http://www.cellphonespec.com/i...k=view&id=19&Itemid=46

imam utisak da ove stranice nisu azurirane tokom ove godine

[ since1986BC @ 25.08.2019. 19:47 ] @
Da osvežamo temu, one more time.
Zračenje je višestruko veće nego što je FCC odobrio.

Older Smartphones Emit Up to 5x Radiation than FCC Allows - Report
Samsung and iPhone lead the pack with the most radiation

https://news.softpedia.com/new...fcc-allows-report-527081.shtml
[quote="Softpedia]The testing was done by an independent FCC-accredited laboratory called RF Exposure Lab, at various distances between 2 and 15 mm. The worst of the bunch was Galaxy S8, with an 8.22W/kg, which five times more than FCC’s limit. It was followed by a few other Samsungs and the iPhone 7 which radiated up to four times more than the maximum limit.

It’s unclear why this is happening, or if the current devices on the market have fixed this issue.
FCC has already issued a statement saying that they will make their own tests.[/quote]

Izvorna vest, Chicago tribune
https://www.chicagotribune.com...zlfda5kyuhteiieh4da-story.html